innocent_lex (
innocent_lex) wrote2010-06-15 09:33 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Dear US folksies
I'm watching Everwood and am somewhere in S2. Ephram (16) has started dating his sister's babysitter (20). which seems to involve kissing and no sex. Andy (dad) has gone absolutely ballistic about the whole thing, claiming it's a felony. I understand that a felony is breaking a law (a big law?). What I don't understand is what law could possibly be broken here. Can some awfully lovely USA person please explain?
Thanks muchly.
Thanks muchly.
no subject
no subject
no subject
But the idea is, a minor is legally incapable of giving consent. So even if they were a willing participant, it's still a crime. Rarely prosecuted.
In some states, the law gives an exception if the participant who is an adult is within a certain age range of the minor. For instance, boyfriend just turned 18 and girlfriend still 17. I believe the range differs from state-to-state as well.
no subject
With no sex happening in this example (so far), and that was clear to all people, I really couldn't figure out why there would be a law against kissing for two consenting people.
no subject
no subject
Out of curiosity, is 16 the age at which people are considered legal adults? (Do you have such a thing?) At what age can people vote? I know you can leave school at 16, and that's got a different meaning than kids being able to 'quit school' here at 16. Here, it means neither they nor their parents will be prosecuted because they're no longer in school, but since they won't have finished the high school program/have a diploma, it's viewed very negatively (they're quitters, slackers, and will be unlikely to find more than a minimum wage job.)
The sense I've had is that your 16 is closer to our 18, the usual age kids graduate high school. It would certainly be better if they did some university or advanced training, but higher ed isn't for everyone and it's at least possible to find a real job with just a HS diploma.
Just wondering if that factors into the statutory rape thing. Our kids are not considered adults until they're 18. Also? People here assume most teens are sexually active with other teens, and as others have noted, an age gap of a year or two isn't normally prosecuted even if one of them is over 18.
Apart from an age gap of more than a year or two, another thing which can make a difference in terms of whether it's prosecuted or not is if the older individual is in a position of authority of some kind over the younger one (babysitter, teacher, supervisor) etc.
no subject
I don't know if that's a great deal of difference from you. We used to have a difference in the age of consent for gay sex vs straight sex but that was fixed years ago.
no subject
Doesn't sound like it, though here you have to be 18 to buy cigarettes (and 21 to buy alcohol, which no, doesn't make much sense.)
I'd say, though, that the age for having legal sex for everyone is 18. It's just not generally prosecuted if they're younger (and as I noted, people assume most teens are having sex with other teens) unless the partner is older or in a position of authority.
no subject